CCTV was shown to a jury of Stephen Crean trying to disarm Anthony Williams during the five-minute attack on 1 November last year.

Prosecutor Christopher Paxton KC said Williams had "brought terror" to the LNER service from Doncaster to the capital.

Williams has admitted 10 counts of wounding with intent relating to the incident on the train at Huntingdon.

He also stabbed four other people in the 24 hours before the attack but denies 14 counts of attempted murder.

Opening the case, Mr Paxton told jurors: "Mr Crean will tell you that the defendant told him, and I quote, 'Do you want to die?'.

He said it was clear evidence of Williams' intention to kill and that Mr Crean had suffered wounds to his hand, head and lower back.

Mr Paxton told Cambridge Crown Court: "The defendant, Mr Williams, armed with a knife, caused terror and fear on an unimaginable scale, moving up and down a busy train, from which there was no escape, stabbing several people as he did so."

Mr Paxton said some passengers ran for their lives, hiding in locked toilets or under seats - while others showed "extraordinary bravery" as they tried to protect themselves and de-escalate the situation.

Crew member fought back with frying pan

Samir Zitouni - a member of the train crew - used a frying pan to try to stop Williams but was stabbed multiple times, the court heard.

Passenger Scott Green, who was travelling with his dog, tried to grab the knife from Williams, who allegedly continued to stab him in his seat.

Others attacked included Kevin Deely, who the court heard received wounds to his scalp and a 9cm deep cut to his stomach, and 73-year-old David Presland, who was attacked after he fell to the ground.

The court was told that Williams spent Halloween and the day after "marauding through towns and cities, on streets and trains alike, armed with a knife".

"He stabbed many, seeking to end their lives with deadly intention, striking out at them when they were defenceless and in fear," Mr Paxton told the court.

Williams attacked three people in Peterborough on the evening of 31 October, including stabbing a 14-year-old boy on a footbridge before lunging with the knife at a man, the court heard.

He's said to have asked them "are you involved?" before allegedly producing a large knife and then attempting to stab a man in the chest in a car park.

The prosecutor said Williams was then seen swigging alcohol outside a barber shop in Queen's Walk, before brandishing his knife inside.

He then took a taxi to Peterborough station and boarded a London-bound train, jurors were told.

The court heard a passenger heard Williams shouting words such as "boom" and "power" as he rummaged in his backpack and also mentioned the "devil".

After arriving in London, Williams is said to have stabbed a 17-year-old in the face and hand on the Docklands Light Railway at Pontoon Dock in the early hours of the following day.

He asked him if he was "beefing with the devil" before launching the attack, jurors were told.

Williams then travelled around on the Tube and train network, before heading back to Peterborough, via Stevenage.

The main attack happened later that evening when 10 people were stabbed on another train - which was heading south to London King's Cross.

Williams is said to have boarded at Peterborough at about 7.29pm. It was forced to make an emergency stop at Huntingdon station at 7.44pm.

The trial continues.

The far-right activist could face up to 10 years in prison after being convicted of harassment causing fear of violence to Andrew Young, an investigative reporter, and Jacob Dirnhuber, an editor at the Daily Mail and MailOnline.

He hired private investigators to find their addresses after an article was published showing him on holiday in Cyprus on 4 August 2024.

Mr Young and a photographer went to the island after Robinson made a series of social media posts on the unfolding unrest over the Southport murders.

The story accused him of "stoking riots from his sunbed".

Robinson - real name Stephen Yaxley-Lennon - claimed in posts on X that the Daily Mail had endangered his family by publishing the article.

He was accused of telling Mr Young "I'm coming to get you" during a call the day after the article was published, and sending a direct message to Mr Dirnhuber saying: "I'll be knocking at your door."

Robinson then posted pictures of Mr Dirnhuber outside his home and images of Mr Young's wife and children on his X account.

Jurors at Southwark Crown Court heard Mr Young was provided with a close protection officer by the Daily Mail, while Mr Dirnhuber had to move house due to fears of a "vigilante" attack.

The private investigators also found the home address of Daily Mail editor-in-chief Ted Verity.

Mr Verity gave police evidence of a voicemail from Robinson, who told him: "I've already located every f****** one of you."

Speaking from the witness box, Robinson, 43, said he wanted to put "pressure" on the journalists but denied that hiring the detectives was designed to "intimidate" them.

Describing one video message he shared on X that was directed at both journalists, Robinson told the court he was "giving a warning", adding: "I'm not coming to beat [them] up. They know that."

He was convicted by a majority of 10 to two on both charges. Robinson - who has said Tesla and SpaceX boss Elon Musk is paying his legal costs - was released on bail and will be sentenced on 16 December.

The offence carries a maximum 10-year prison sentence - or 14 years if the offence was racially or religiously aggravated.

Robinson called the outcome "just insane" in a post on social media after leaving court.

Daily Mail responds to verdict

The Daily Mail said in a statement: "We welcome today's verdict and are pleased that Stephen Yaxley-Lennon has been found guilty of harassment causing fear of violence to two of our journalists.

"Yaxley-Lennon's behaviour was reprehensible and had grave consequences for our reporters and their families.

"Through his actions, Yaxley-Lennon sought to undermine our right to hold him to account. We stand by our journalists and their freedom to report legitimately in the public interest."

More from Sky News:
Main budget announcements at a glance
Suspects to go on trial accused of vandalising Trump's golf resort

Frank Ferguson, head of the Crown Prosecution Service's special crime and counter-terrorism division, said Robinson had "weaponised social media" against the journalists.

He said: "The evidence in this case showed that he targeted the victims directly and indirectly through social media and by telephone. He also published images relating not only to them, but also their families."

Mr Ferguson added: "Journalists play an important role in a democratic society and should be able to carry out their professional duties without being subjected to harassment."

The defeated candidate has flown to the US and thanked Donald Trump and "the wonderful American people for welcoming me".

The 45-year-old landed in Miami on Wednesday morning (local time) after travelling from South America on a private jet.

Mr Bolsonaro alleged that in Brazil there has been a "politically-motivated witch-hunt, intended to hold me hostage".

"Faced with the politicisation of the justice system in Brazil, I brought my family to the United States," the right-wing senator said.

He insisted he did not flee the country and left "so I could be the leader my people deserve".

And he said he would "lead the opposition from here".

Mr Bolsonaro made his comments in an open letter shared ⁠with journalists by his allies, Reuters reported.

He later deleted the letter, in which ⁠he called himself "president-elect ⁠of Brazil", ‌from social ‌media and quickly published a ⁠new ​document calling ​himself ​the "leader ⁠of Brazil".

He did not give any evidence for the alleged electoral fraud. International observers ⁠have found Sunday's voting was fair.

Mr Bolsonaro has refused to concede following defeat to his rival, widely known as Lula, in the run-off vote and threatened to attempt to annul the election result.

He was ordered by Brazil's Supreme Court to surrender his passports ​to ​federal police as part of a probe into alleged money laundering, which he denies.

But he instead followed his father, jailed former president Jair Bolsonaro, who also fled to Florida after losing the 2022 presidential election to Lula.

Mr Bolsonaro and his family crossed into Argentina via the Tancredo Neves International Bridge border crossing, before boarding a private flight bound for Ecuador, according to Argentina's migration department.

The senator appeared to be "distraught and fearful" of being arrested after his shock defeat became clear, news outlet O Globo said.

Lula won a historic fourth term in Sunday's election in a surprise result that defied polls.

He described reports his opponent had left the country as "shameful".

Voting was neck and neck throughout Sunday evening's count, before Lula, 81, pulled away to secure an unprecedented fourth term in office.

With virtually 100% of the vote counted, Brazil's electoral court said Lula had secured 51.79% of the ballots cast, to Mr Bolsonaro's 48.21%.

But Mr Bolsonaro refused to accept defeat and asked for the election results to be annulled after voting time had been extended by two hours by a supreme court judge. He said the extension was "unacceptable".

Mr Trump did ​not endorse Mr Bolsonaro ahead of the vote, but said on Monday the results "looked like another ‌rigged election" without providing evidence.

Lula's victory was all the more remarkable given that Mr Bolsonaro beat him by 2.2 million votes in the first round of the election earlier this month.

Andrew McAdam, 36, pleaded guilty to nine charges spanning March 2023 to September 2024.

Police Scotland said the sexual crimes against the infant took place in Edinburgh and the Trossachs.

The force said McAdam's offences also included conspiring with others across the border to commit sexual abuse, sharing indecent images, sexual exposure, public indecency and sexual communications.

He was jailed at the High Court in Glasgow on Tuesday.

In his sentencing statement, judge Lord Scott said McAdam conspired to sexually exploit and abuse his infant victim and "incited and encouraged the rape" of a separate child at the hands of another man.

The judge stated: "Some conspiracies go no further than the agreement to commit a crime before a change of mind or detection, but this wicked conspiracy was made real."

Lord Scott added: "All of this was entirely for your own gratification."

Part of a victim impact statement prepared by the infant's parents was read out to the court.

In it, they said: "The potential impact of [the child] finding out what happened in the wrong way is catastrophic.

"It is like holding a bomb with the power to completely destroy your child's life if it is detonated at the wrong moment.

"It is terrifying not knowing the impact that this will have, not knowing if our approach to telling [the child] will be the right one."

The parents also lamented that when the child grows up and "inevitably makes mistakes or choices" they disagree with, they will "forever question if the crimes [the victim] faced at such a young age and their impact, direct or indirectly, will have contributed".

More from Sky News:
Russell Brand rape trial live
Joanne Young case latest

Highlighting the criminal justice social work report prepared, Lord Scott said McAdam had "shown no convincing or meaningful remorse".

The judge noted: "You take limited responsibility for your offending - deflecting, minimising and denying the full extent of your involvement."

McAdam was handed an extended sentence, with 10-and-a-half years in jail and three-and-a-half years on licence once released back into the community.

He was also placed on the sex offenders' register indefinitely and banned from contacting his victim.

Police Scotland urged all those who have experienced sexual abuse to report it to the force.

Detective Inspector Wells said: "McAdam subjected his child victim to horrific abuse."

The DI added: "Sexual crime of any kind has no place in society and we remain committed to supporting victims and bringing those responsible to justice."

Sir Chris Bryant earlier this month said he would ban the parade after a standoff between Orangemen and nationalist residents of the Garvaghy Road in Portadown, County Armagh, lasted almost two weeks.

The Parades Commission had said the march, set to begin at Drumcree Church, could go ahead on 27 September.

It would have been the first time it had been down the mainly nationalist Garvaghy Road in almost 30 years. However, a large number of residents blocked the route late into the night.

After Sir Chris stepped in, a member of the Orange Order sought a judicial review into his intervention and the role of PSNI Chief Constable Jon Boutcher.

On Wednesday morning, Mr Justice Scoffield found the decision by Sir Chris was lawful.

"The secretary of state's decision was lawful and within the margin of discretion properly afforded to him, although it was highly regrettable it was required in the circumstances in which it arose," he said.

Mr Justice Scoffield went on to say those opposed to the parade "should take no particular joy in the outcome of this case".

He added: "The secretary of state's decision was lawful but the position which has now been reached has been brought about at very significant cost to the people of Northern Ireland, financially, through the diversion of police resources and in terms of community relations.

"Depressingly the threat of serious and widespread disorder has loomed large in the matters under consideration."

More from Sky News:
Main budget announcements at a glance
Tommy Robinson found guilty of harassment

Mr Justice Scoffield also referred to the ongoing police investigation into alleged breaches of the Parades Commission determination.

First Minister Michelle O'Neill is among a host of Sinn Fein and People Before Profit representatives who have attended voluntary interviews with police in that probe.

The judge highlighted that Article 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights protects the right to freedom of peaceful assembly.

"Whatever one's standing or strength of conviction, the law does not apply only when you agree with it or with the outcome of a particular legal process. That is one thing which the court is both entitled and in my view duty-bound to point out in the circumstances of this case," he said.

"It is a lesson for those on all sides of the debate in our society which at least for some remains deeply divided along traditional fault lines, such divisions enhance rather than undermine the need for respect both for the rule of law and for the decisions of the legal mechanisms established in our democracy to resolve deep-seated disputes."

He concluded: "I refuse the substantive application for judicial review, the applicant's claim therefore is dismissed."

An appeal is expected to be lodged against the decision.